BO2028
Shop Now

THE RECEIPTS

JANUARY 20, 2025 → Present

467 Documented Actions And Counting

Don't take our word for it. Keep the receipts.

A running record of the decisions, court fights, executive actions, rule changes, maps, election disputes, and political moments reshaping the system in real time.

Facts and sources are presented separately from BO2028 commentary. Every entry cites its own evidence — primary documents first.

Sort

192 RECEIPTS — 2026

SEPTEMBER 2026 — 3 Receipts

ECONOMYENACTED

Promoting Fair Competition In Livestock Markets And Expanding Market Access for American Meat Producers

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Promoting Fair Competition In Livestock Markets And Expanding Market Access for American Meat Producers."[1] The document states: "It is the policy of the United States to support these goals and reduce barriers to ranchers processing their own product for sale to consumers by promoting fair competition in livestock and meat markets;"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — September 4, 2026Primary

    Promoting Fair Competition In Livestock Markets And Expanding Market Access for American Meat Producers

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Supporting America's Ranchers

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Supporting America's Ranchers."[1] The document states: "These hardworking Americans ensure that our country has a reliable domestic source of high-quality animal protein products, and a secure, plentiful domestic ranching industry vindicates this country’s food security."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — September 4, 2026Primary

    Supporting America's Ranchers

    View Original Source →
COURTSDEVELOPING

Supreme Court Acts on Emergency Application in National Republican Congressional Committee v. Brown

The Receipt

The Supreme Court ruled on an emergency application in National Republican Congressional Committee v. Brown (No. 26A274). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Because the Fourth Circuit likely lacked jurisdiction to review the Federal Communications Commission’s lowest-unit-charge requirements while the candidates’ application for review remained pending before the Commission and the party committees would otherwise suffer irreparable First Amendment harm, the party committees’ application for a stay is granted."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — September 4, 2026Primary

    National Republican Congressional Committee v. Brown (No. 26A274) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →

AUGUST 2026 — 15 Receipts

COURTSDEVELOPING

Supreme Court Acts on Emergency Application in National Park Service v. National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States

The Receipt

The Supreme Court ruled on an emergency application in National Park Service v. National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States (No. 26A203). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Because the government has established that it is likely to prevail in showing that the Trust lacks Article III standing to challenge the East Wing project in federal court, that it would likely suffer irreparable harm without a stay, and that the balance of equities tips in its favor, the injunction entered by the District Court is stayed pending the disposition of the government’s forthcoming petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is timely sought."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — August 31, 2026Primary

    National Park Service v. National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States (No. 26A203) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
IMMIGRATIONENACTED

Federal Rule: Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) Electronic Export Manifest for Rail Cargo

The Receipt

Homeland Security Department published a significant final rule, "Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) Electronic Export Manifest for Rail Cargo", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is revising its regulations pursuant to the Trade Act of 2002 requiring the transmission of export manifest data electronically in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) for cargo transported by rail for any train departing the United States. This rule mandates the electronic transmission of rail export manifest information, identifies the parties eligi"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Homeland Security Department — August 26, 2026Primary

    Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) Electronic Export Manifest for Rail Cargo

    View Original Source →
COURTSDEVELOPING

Supreme Court Acts on Emergency Application in Trump v. California

The Receipt

The Supreme Court ruled on an emergency application in Trump v. California (No. 26A124). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The Government’s application to stay the District Court’s injunction in 26A124—which forbids the Government to implement §§2 and 3 of Executive Order No. 14399—is granted; the application for a stay in 26A139 is denied as moot."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — August 24, 2026Primary

    Trump v. California (No. 26A124) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
IMMIGRATIONENACTED

Federal Rule: Modifications to the Regulations Implementing the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, as Amended

The Receipt

Labor Department published a significant final rule, "Modifications to the Regulations Implementing the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, as Amended", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "The U.S. Department of Labor publishes this final rule to revise its implementing regulations for the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, as amended (VEVRAA). These revisions will align the regulations with Executive Order 14173 and remove the VEVRAA regulations' cross-references to the Executive Order 11246 authority. Executive Order 11246 was revoked by Executive Order 141"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Labor Department — August 21, 2026Primary

    Modifications to the Regulations Implementing the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, as Amended

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Federal Rule: Application for Relief From Disabilities Imposed by Federal Laws With Respect to the Acquisition, Receipt, Transfer, Shipment, Transport

The Receipt

Justice Department published a significant final rule, "Application for Relief From Disabilities Imposed by Federal Laws With Respect to the Acquisition, Receipt, Transfer, Shipment, Transportation, or Possession of Firearms", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "The Department of Justice ("the Department") is implementing criteria to guide determinations for granting relief from disabilities imposed by federal laws with respect to the acquisition, receipt, transfer, shipment, transportation, or possession of firearms. The criteria are designed to ensure that the fundamental right of the people to keep and bear arms is not unduly infringed, that those peop"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Justice Department — August 20, 2026Primary

    Application for Relief From Disabilities Imposed by Federal Laws With Respect to the Acquisition, Receipt, Transfer, Shipment, Transportation, or Possession of Firearms

    View Original Source →
IMMIGRATIONENACTED

Federal Rule: Wagner-Peyser Act Employment Service Staffing

The Receipt

Labor Department published a significant final rule, "Wagner-Peyser Act Employment Service Staffing", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL or the Department) is removing the requirement that States use State merit staff to provide Wagner-Peyser Employment Service (ES) services. This final rule allows States to use the staffing model that provides the required services with the most efficient and cost-effective model for their State."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Labor Department — August 20, 2026Primary

    Wagner-Peyser Act Employment Service Staffing

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Federal Rule: Differential Pay for Prescribed Wildland Fire Activities

The Receipt

Personnel Management Office published a significant final rule, "Differential Pay for Prescribed Wildland Fire Activities", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "The Office of Personnel Management is issuing a final rule to add prescribed (planned) wildland fire duties as covered activities triggering payment of Hazardous Duty Pay (HDP) for General Schedule (GS) employees and Environmental Differential Pay (EDP) for Federal Wage System (FWS) employees. The final rule authorizes a 25 percent differential for GS and FWS employees participating as a member of"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Personnel Management Office — August 14, 2026Primary

    Differential Pay for Prescribed Wildland Fire Activities

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Adjusting Imports of Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Unmanned Aircraft Systems Components into the United States

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Adjusting Imports of Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Unmanned Aircraft Systems Components into the United States."[1] The document states: "Based on the facts considered in that investigation, and taking into account the close relation of the economic welfare of the Nation to our national security and other relevant factors, see section 232(d) (19 U.S.C."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — August 13, 2026Primary

    Adjusting Imports of Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Unmanned Aircraft Systems Components into the United States

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Rebuilding the United States Navy and America’s Shipbuilding Industrial Base

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Rebuilding the United States Navy and America’s Shipbuilding Industrial Base."[1] The document states: "The Department of War shall restore both capacity and competition to the maritime industrial base as it expands our naval force structure."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — August 13, 2026Primary

    Rebuilding the United States Navy and America’s Shipbuilding Industrial Base

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cyber-Enabled Crime

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cyber-Enabled Crime."[1] The document states: "Thus, it is the policy of the United States to use all instruments of national power, including the innovative capabilities of the private sector, to combat cybercrime."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — August 12, 2026Primary

    Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cyber-Enabled Crime

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Delivering Gold Standard Childhood Vaccine Recommendations for Americans

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Delivering Gold Standard Childhood Vaccine Recommendations for Americans."[1] The document states: "Therefore, I am taking further action to reaffirm that it is the policy of the United States that the core childhood vaccine recommendations should be aligned with scientific evidence and best practices from peer, developed countries while preserving access to vaccines currently available to Americans."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — August 10, 2026Primary

    Delivering Gold Standard Childhood Vaccine Recommendations for Americans

    View Original Source →
CONSTITUTIONENACTED

Continuing to Protect the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Continuing to Protect the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship."[1] The document states: "Since my first day in office, my Administration has guarded against the risks posed by malign foreign actors who attempt to swindle American citizens by taking advantage of the generosity of our Nation."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — August 6, 2026Primary

    Continuing to Protect the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship

    View Original Source →
IMMIGRATIONENACTED

Ending Birth Tourism

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Ending Birth Tourism."[1] The document states: "It embodies a sacred bond between the American people and the Nation in which they live, and carries profound rights, privileges, and responsibilities reflective of the enduring allegiance of citizens to the United States and our Constitution."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — August 6, 2026Primary

    Ending Birth Tourism

    View Original Source →
CONSTITUTIONENACTED

National Purple Heart Day, 2026

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential proclamation, "National Purple Heart Day, 2026."[1] The document states: "TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim August 7, 2026, as National Purple Heart Day."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATION — The White House — August 6, 2026Primary

    National Purple Heart Day, 2026

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Adjusting Imports of Polysilicon and its Derivatives into the United States

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Adjusting Imports of Polysilicon and its Derivatives into the United States."[1] The document states: "Polysilicon is the base material underpinning the security of America’s semiconductor and solar-power supply chains."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — August 6, 2026Primary

    Adjusting Imports of Polysilicon and its Derivatives into the United States

    View Original Source →

JULY 2026 — 10 Receipts

ECONOMYENACTED

To Facilitate Positive Adjustment to Competition from Imports of Quartz Surface Products

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "To Facilitate Positive Adjustment to Competition from Imports of Quartz Surface Products."[1] The document states: "2252(b)) that QSP is being imported into the United States in such increased quantities as to be a substantial cause of serious injury to the domestic industry producing an article like or directly competitive with the imported article."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — July 31, 2026Primary

    To Facilitate Positive Adjustment to Competition from Imports of Quartz Surface Products

    View Original Source →
IMMIGRATIONENACTED

Federal Rule: General Services Administration Property Management Regulation (GSPMR); Nondiscrimination on the Basis of the Age Act Regulation for Pro

The Receipt

General Services Administration published a significant final rule, "General Services Administration Property Management Regulation (GSPMR); Nondiscrimination on the Basis of the Age Act Regulation for Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance; Technical Amendment", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "The General Services Administration (GSA) is publishing a technical amendment to effectuate the rule published March 6, 2026. That published rule required clarifying edits in the amendatory instructions in order to facilitate the removal of GSA's regulations from the government-wide Federal Property Management Regulation (FPMR) and the addition of those regulations into the General Services Admini"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — General Services Administration — July 30, 2026Primary

    General Services Administration Property Management Regulation (GSPMR); Nondiscrimination on the Basis of the Age Act Regulation for Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance; Technical Amendment

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Restoring Trust in the Smithsonian Institution

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Restoring Trust in the Smithsonian Institution."[1] The document states: "Such signage shall notify visitors that the Museum exhibits should be renovated consistent with the findings in the Report and direct visitors to locations and resources for accurate information regarding America’s history."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — July 24, 2026Primary

    Restoring Trust in the Smithsonian Institution

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Imposing Additional Duties to Offset Canadian Discrimination Against the Commerce of the United States with Respect to Alcoholic Beverages

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Imposing Additional Duties to Offset Canadian Discrimination Against the Commerce of the United States with Respect to Alcoholic Beverages."[1] The document states: "1338) (section 338) empowers the President to, among other things, impose duties on imports of a foreign country to offset the burden or disadvantage from a foreign country’s discrimination against or unequal imposition on the commerce of the United States."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — July 20, 2026Primary

    Imposing Additional Duties to Offset Canadian Discrimination Against the Commerce of the United States with Respect to Alcoholic Beverages

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Further Strengthening Actions Taken to Adjust Imports of Aluminum into the United States

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Further Strengthening Actions Taken to Adjust Imports of Aluminum into the United States."[1] The document states: "In Proclamation 9704 of March 8, 2018 (Adjusting Imports of Aluminum Into the United States), as amended, I found, under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended, 19 U.S.C."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — July 20, 2026Primary

    Further Strengthening Actions Taken to Adjust Imports of Aluminum into the United States

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Securing America’s Defense Supply Chains and Ensuring Domestic Acquisition of Critical Materials

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Securing America’s Defense Supply Chains and Ensuring Domestic Acquisition of Critical Materials."[1] The document states: "It is the policy of the United States that not only the finished equipment deployed by our military, but also the critical materials and components necessary to manufacture, maintain, sustain, and repair that equipment, are sourced domestically or from allied nations."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — July 20, 2026Primary

    Securing America’s Defense Supply Chains and Ensuring Domestic Acquisition of Critical Materials

    View Original Source →
IMMIGRATIONENACTED

Federal Rule: Rescinding the Definition of “Harm” Under the Endangered Species Act

The Receipt

Interior Department published a significant final rule, "Rescinding the Definition of “Harm” Under the Endangered Species Act", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS; collectively referred to as the "Services") rescind the regulatory definition of "harm" in our Endangered Species Act (ESA or the Act) regulations. This rescission removes the regulatory definition of "harm" from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in Title 50 parts 17 and 222."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Interior Department — July 14, 2026Primary

    Rescinding the Definition of “Harm” Under the Endangered Species Act

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-102: Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act of 2025

The Receipt

S. 629 was enacted as Public Law 119-102. Stated purpose: "To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 to remove barriers to agricultural producers in accessing funds to carry out emergency measures under the emergency conservation program, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — July 12, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-102 (S. 629)

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-101: To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes.

The Receipt

H.R. 6644 was enacted as Public Law 119-101. Stated purpose: "To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — July 11, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-101 (H.R. 6644)

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Adjusting Imports of Commercial Aircraft, Jet Engines, and Aircraft and Engine Parts into the United States

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Adjusting Imports of Commercial Aircraft, Jet Engines, and Aircraft and Engine Parts into the United States."[1] The document states: "Within the past 90 days, the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) transmitted to me a report on his investigation into the effects of imports of commercial aircraft, jet engines, and their associated parts on the national security of the United States under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended, 19 U.S.C."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — July 9, 2026Primary

    Adjusting Imports of Commercial Aircraft, Jet Engines, and Aircraft and Engine Parts into the United States

    View Original Source →

JUNE 2026 — 46 Receipts

COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides West Virginia v. B. P. J.

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in West Virginia v. B. P. J. (No. 24-43). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Title IX allows schools to provide separate women’s and men’s sports teams defined by biological sex; West Virginia and Idaho did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by maintaining female sports teams for biological females."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 30, 2026Primary

    West Virginia v. B. P. J. (No. 24-43) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Comm’n

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Comm’n (No. 24-621). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The Federal Election Campaign Act’s restrictions on a political party’s spending on campaign activities in coordination with candidates, 52 U. S. C. §30116(d), violates the First Amendment."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 30, 2026Primary

    National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Comm’n (No. 24-621) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Trump v. Barbara

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Trump v. Barbara (No. 25-365). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 30, 2026Primary

    Trump v. Barbara (No. 25-365) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Declaration of Emergency and Authorization for Temporary Duty Free Importation of Phosphate Fertilizer Morocco

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Declaration of Emergency and Authorization for Temporary Duty Free Importation of Phosphate Fertilizer Morocco."[1] The document states: "Producers of corn, soybeans, wheat, and a variety of other crops need phosphate fertilizers to ensure strong crop yields to feed the population."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — June 29, 2026Primary

    Declaration of Emergency and Authorization for Temporary Duty Free Importation of Phosphate Fertilizer Morocco

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Lowering the Cost of Living by Promoting the Freedom to Fix

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Lowering the Cost of Living by Promoting the Freedom to Fix."[1] The document states: "To further ensure vehicle affordability, it is the policy of my Administration that consumers should be able to fix their vehicles with affordable parts without being deemed to have circumvented emissions controls."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — June 29, 2026Primary

    Lowering the Cost of Living by Promoting the Freedom to Fix

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Watson v. Republican National Committee

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Watson v. Republican National Committee (No. 24-1260). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The federal election-day statutes—3 U. S. C. §1, 2 U. S. C. §§ 1, 7—do not prevent Mississippi from counting absentee ballots postmarked by election day but received up to five days thereafter; nothing in the federal election-day statutes requires ballots to be received by election day."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 29, 2026Primary

    Watson v. Republican National Committee (No. 24-1260) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Chatrie v. United States

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Chatrie v. United States (No. 25-112). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Police officers conducted a Fourth Amendment search when they acquired Okello Chatrie’s location data from Google because an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell-phone location information."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 29, 2026Primary

    Chatrie v. United States (No. 25-112) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSDEVELOPING

Supreme Court Acts on Emergency Application in Trump v. Cook

The Receipt

The Supreme Court ruled on an emergency application in Trump v. Cook (No. 25A312). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The Government’s application to stay the District Court’s order preliminarily enjoining the purported firing of Federal Reserve System Governor Lisa Cook pending the conclusion of litigation over her attempted removal is denied."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 29, 2026Primary

    Trump v. Cook (No. 25A312) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Trump v. Slaughter

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Trump v. Slaughter (No. 25-332). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The Federal Trade Commission’s for-cause removal provision, 15 U. S. C. §41, is contrary to the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 29, 2026Primary

    Trump v. Slaughter (No. 25-332) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
IMMIGRATIONENACTED

Federal Rule: Alien Registration Form and Evidence of Registration

The Receipt

Homeland Security Department published a significant final rule, "Alien Registration Form and Evidence of Registration", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "On March 12, 2025, DHS issued an interim final rule (IFR) with request for comments amending DHS regulations to designate a new registration form for aliens to comply with statutory alien registration and fingerprinting provisions. Unregistered aliens may use this general registration form to satisfy their statutory obligations. This final rule responds to public comments, amends DHS regulations t"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Homeland Security Department — June 29, 2026Primary

    Alien Registration Form and Evidence of Registration

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-100: To require the Federal Communications Commission to issue an order providing that a shark attack is an event for which a wireless emergency alert may be transmitted, and for other purposes.

The Receipt

S. 1003 was enacted as Public Law 119-100. Stated purpose: "To require the Federal Communications Commission to issue an order providing that a shark attack is an event for which a wireless emergency alert may be transmitted, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — June 26, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-100 (S. 1003)

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Federal Rule: Uniform Allowances

The Receipt

Personnel Management Office published a significant final rule, "Uniform Allowances", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is confirming the effective date of its direct final rule amending 5 CFR part 591, subpart A, to increase the governmentwide maximum annual uniform allowance rate to $1,500 and make related technical and clarifying changes. OPM received no significant adverse comments during the comment period and therefore confirms the rule will become effective as schedul"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Personnel Management Office — June 26, 2026Primary

    Uniform Allowances

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Advancing Regenerative Agriculture and Strengthening American Farm Resilience

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Advancing Regenerative Agriculture and Strengthening American Farm Resilience."[1] The document states: "Therefore, it is the policy of the United States to promote continued advances in precision agriculture technologies;"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — June 25, 2026Primary

    Advancing Regenerative Agriculture and Strengthening American Farm Resilience

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Monsanto v. Durnell

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Monsanto v. Durnell (No. 24-1068). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U. S. C. §136v(b), expressly preempts Durnell’s state-law failure-to-warn claim because the claim would require Monsanto to add a cancer warning to its Roundup products’ label."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 25, 2026Primary

    Monsanto v. Durnell (No. 24-1068) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Mullin v. Doe

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Mullin v. Doe (No. 25-1083). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Section 1254a(b)(5)(A) bars judicial review of non-constitutional claims related to Temporary Protected Status (TPS); Miot respondents’ equal protection claim—that Haiti’s TPS designation was terminated because of race—is unlikely to succeed because a race-neutral explanation for the Government’s action exists: the current administration opposes the TPS program as it has been implemented in the past and has terminated every TPS designation that has come up for renewal."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 25, 2026Primary

    Mullin v. Doe (No. 25-1083) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Mullin v. Al Otro Lado

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Mullin v. Al Otro Lado (No. 25-5). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, an alien “arrives in the United States” for purposes of 8 U. S. C. §§1158(a)(1) and 1225(a) only when the alien crosses the border into the United States; the INA neither entitles an alien standing at the border in Mexico to apply for asylum nor requires an immigration officer to inspect him."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 25, 2026Primary

    Mullin v. Al Otro Lado (No. 25-5) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Wolford v. Lopez

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Wolford v. Lopez (No. 24-1046). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Hawaii’s law prohibiting licensed concealed-carry permit holders from carrying handguns on private property open to the public without the property owner’s express authorization violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendments."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 25, 2026Primary

    Wolford v. Lopez (No. 24-1046) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe (No. 24-856). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Courts may not create new rights of action to remedy violations of international law under the Alien Tort Statute; neither the ATS nor the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991 imposes liability for aiding-and-abetting offenses."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 23, 2026Primary

    Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe (No. 24-856) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S. A. (Cuba)

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S. A. (Cuba) (No. 24-699). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The Helms-Burton Act, formally known as the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act, §301, 110 Stat. 815, 22 U. S. C. §6021 et seq., abrogates the sovereign immunity of Cuban agencies and instrumentalities; plaintiffs who sue Cuban agencies or instrumentalities under the Act need not also satisfy one of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act’s enumerated exceptions to foreign sovereign immunity."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 23, 2026Primary

    Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S. A. (Cuba) (No. 24-699) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Landor v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections and Public Safety

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Landor v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections and Public Safety (No. 23-1197). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "State employees may not be held liable in their personal capacities under a Spending Clause statute such as the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 unless those individuals have voluntarily and knowingly consented to answer private suits under the statute; the individual defendants in this case did not do so here, so Landor’s case cannot proceed against them."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 23, 2026Primary

    Landor v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections and Public Safety (No. 23-1197) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Pung v. Isabella County

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Pung v. Isabella County (No. 25-95). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The proper baseline for measuring “just compensation” following a fairly conducted tax sale is the auction sale price, not the property’s hypothetical fair market value; Isabella County did not violate the Eighth Amendment Excessive Fines Clause by failing to compensate the taxpayer for his property’s fair market value."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 23, 2026Primary

    Pung v. Isabella County (No. 25-95) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Blanche v. Lau

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Blanche v. Lau (No. 25-429). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The Immigration and Nationality Act does not require a border officer to have clear and convincing evidence that a lawful permanent resident has committed a crime involving moral turpitude before deeming the resident an applicant for admission."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 23, 2026Primary

    Blanche v. Lau (No. 25-429) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks."[1] The document states: "The advent of large-scale quantum computers, particularly in the hands of adversaries, will pose a significant threat to widely used cryptographic security systems."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — June 22, 2026Primary

    Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides McCarthy v. Hernandez

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in McCarthy v. Hernandez (No. 25-748). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The Second Circuit exceeded its authority in holding that Hernandez is entitled to habeas relief under 28 U. S. C. §2254(d)(1); no clearly established federal law required the trial court to instruct the jury about the rule that Justice Kennedy adopted in Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U. S. 600, and the Second Circuit erred in holding otherwise."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 22, 2026Primary

    McCarthy v. Hernandez (No. 25-748) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides United States v. Hemani

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in United States v. Hemani (No. 24-1234). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Prosecution of Ali Hemani under 18 U. S. C. §922(g)(3)—for knowingly possessing a gun in his home while being an unlawful user of a controlled substance—is inconsistent with the Second Amendment."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 18, 2026Primary

    United States v. Hemani (No. 24-1234) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Hunter v. United States

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hunter v. United States (No. 24-1063). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "An agreement not to appeal a sentence is unenforceable when it would result in a miscarriage of justice—meaning, when it would leave in place the kind of egregious error that would bring the judicial system into disrepute."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 18, 2026Primary

    Hunter v. United States (No. 24-1063) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides T. M. v. University of Md. Medical System Corporation

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in T. M. v. University of Md. Medical System Corporation (No. 25-197). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars federal district court jurisdiction over cases brought by state-court losers complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments rendered before the district court proceedings commenced and seeking district court review and rejection of those judgments, regardless of whether the state-court judgment remains subject to further review in state appellate proceedings."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 18, 2026Primary

    T. M. v. University of Md. Medical System Corporation (No. 25-197) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

National Security Presidential Memorandum/NSPM-12

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential memorandum, "National Security Presidential Memorandum/NSPM-12."[1] The document states: "It shall be the policy of the United States Government that these systems be defended to the greatest extent practicable and that executive department and agency (agency) heads be accountable for this defense through government-wide oversight mechanisms."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    PRESIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM — The White House — June 12, 2026Primary

    National Security Presidential Memorandum/NSPM-12

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-99: Alaska's Right to Ivory Sales and Tradition Act

The Receipt

S. 254 was enacted as Public Law 119-99. Stated purpose: "To amend the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 to protect the cultural practices and livelihoods of producers of Alaska Native handicrafts and marine mammal ivory products, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — June 12, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-99 (S. 254)

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Inc.

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Inc. (No. 25-6). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "To determine whether an omission of a claim in the bankruptcy context was inadvertent or mistaken for purposes of the judicial estoppel doctrine, courts should look to the totality of the circumstances surrounding the omission; the Fifth Circuit erred in narrowing its inquiry in this case to whether the debtor had knowledge of the underlying facts or a potential motive to conceal the claim."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 11, 2026Primary

    Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Inc. (No. 25-6) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd.

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd. (No. 24-345). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Section 47(b) of the Investment Company Act does not impliedly empower private parties to sue for rescission of contracts that allegedly violate the Act."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 11, 2026Primary

    FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd. (No. 24-345) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Abouammo v. United States

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Abouammo v. United States (No. 25-5146). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "A defendant charged with knowingly falsifying a document with the intent to obstruct a federal investigation in violation of 18 U. S. C. §1519 must be tried in the district where the falsification occurred; the defendant cannot be tried in a different district where the investigation was located because no “conduct constituting the offense” happened there."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 11, 2026Primary

    Abouammo v. United States (No. 25-5146) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-98: Secure America Act

The Receipt

S. 2 was enacted as Public Law 119-98. Stated purpose: "To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of S. Con. Res. 33."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — June 10, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-98 (S. 2)

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-96: Gerald E. Connolly Esophageal Cancer Awareness Act of 2025

The Receipt

H.R. 3490 was enacted as Public Law 119-96. Stated purpose: "To require the Government Accountability Office to produce a report on esophageal cancer, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — June 9, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-96 (H.R. 3490)

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-97: Fiscal Year 2025 Veterans Affairs Major Medical Facility Authorization Act

The Receipt

S. 2393 was enacted as Public Law 119-97. Stated purpose: "To authorize a major medical facility project for the Department of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2026 in St. Louis, Missouri, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — June 9, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-97 (S. 2393)

    View Original Source →
IMMIGRATIONENACTED

Federal Rule: Implementation of the Substance Use-Disorder Prevention That Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment for Patients and Communities Act of

The Receipt

Justice Department published a significant final rule, "Implementation of the Substance Use-Disorder Prevention That Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment for Patients and Communities Act of 2018: Dispensing and Administering Controlled Substances for Medication-Assisted Treatment", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "The "Substance Use-Disorder Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment for Patients and Communities Act of 2018 (the SUPPORT Act)," which became law on October 24, 2018, amended the Controlled Substances Act to expand the conditions a practitioner must meet to provide medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder and expand the options available for a physician to be considered"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Justice Department — June 9, 2026Primary

    Implementation of the Substance Use-Disorder Prevention That Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment for Patients and Communities Act of 2018: Dispensing and Administering Controlled Substances for Medication-Assisted Treatment

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

National Security Presidential Memorandum/NSPM-11

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential memorandum, "National Security Presidential Memorandum/NSPM-11."[1] The document states: "The national security enterprise shall accelerate AI adoption by identifying mission areas where AI can enhance operational effectiveness and eliminating unnecessary barriers to rapid deployment."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    PRESIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM — The White House — June 5, 2026Primary

    National Security Presidential Memorandum/NSPM-11

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Granting Pardon to Stephen E. Buyer

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Granting Pardon to Stephen E. Buyer."[1] The document states: "Buyer: The Attorney General shall administer and effectuate the immediate issuance of a certificate of pardon to the individual named herein."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — June 4, 2026Primary

    Granting Pardon to Stephen E. Buyer

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc. (No. 24-889). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Amarin has failed to state a claim for actively inducing infringement of its brand-name drug’s patented uses in violation of 35 U. S. C. §271(b), so its complaint cannot withstand Hikma’s motion to dismiss."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 4, 2026Primary

    Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc. (No. 24-889) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Sripetch v. SEC

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Sripetch v. SEC (No. 25-466). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "A showing of pecuniary loss to investors is not required before the SEC may obtain a disgorgement award under 15 U. S. C. §78u(d)(5) or §78u(d)(7)."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 4, 2026Primary

    Sripetch v. SEC (No. 25-466) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides FCC v. AT&T

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in FCC v. AT&T (No. 25-406). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Because forfeiture orders issued under 47 U. S. C. §503(b)(4) do not definitively resolve the parties’ legal obligations, and the FCC’s factual findings in its forfeiture proceedings are not conclusive, it does not violate the Seventh Amendment for the FCC to issue forfeiture orders without the involvement of a jury."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 4, 2026Primary

    FCC v. AT&T (No. 25-406) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Strengthening Customs Enforcement

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Strengthening Customs Enforcement."[1] The document states: "These revisions shall include: (i)    requiring that an IOR maintain at all times a minimum level of tangible domestic assets, bonding, or both, as determined by U.S."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — June 3, 2026Primary

    Strengthening Customs Enforcement

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security."[1] The document states: "It is the policy of the United States to promote AI innovation and security by working collaboratively with the private sector to modernize government and private sector information systems and harden them against external threats;"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — June 2, 2026Primary

    Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Further Adjusting the Tariff Regimes for Imports of Aluminum, Steel, and Copper into the United States

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Further Adjusting the Tariff Regimes for Imports of Aluminum, Steel, and Copper into the United States."[1] The document states: "In Proclamation 9704 of March 8, 2018 (Adjusting Imports of Aluminum Into the United States), as amended;"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — June 2, 2026Primary

    Further Adjusting the Tariff Regimes for Imports of Aluminum, Steel, and Copper into the United States

    View Original Source →
COURTSDEVELOPING

Supreme Court Acts on Emergency Application in Allen v. Milligan

The Receipt

The Supreme Court ruled on an emergency application in Allen v. Milligan (No. 25A1314). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The applications for stay presented to JUSTICE THOMAS and by him referred to the Court are granted; at this preliminary stage, the State has shown that it is entitled to interim relief from the District Court’s injunction."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 2, 2026Primary

    Allen v. Milligan (No. 25A1314) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Whitton v. Dixon

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Whitton v. Dixon (No. 25-580). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The Court of Appeals erred in considering post-trial DNA evidence when assessing whether the Florida Supreme Court reasonably determined that jailhouse informant Ozio’s testimony was immaterial to the jury’s verdict, because evidence not presented to the jury could not have influenced the jury’s verdict and therefore sheds no light on whether Ozio’s testimony influenced that verdict."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — June 1, 2026Primary

    Whitton v. Dixon (No. 25-580) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →

MAY 2026 — 27 Receipts

EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Approving Critical Position Pay Authority for National Security Investment Workforce

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Approving Critical Position Pay Authority for National Security Investment Workforce."[1] The document states: "535.103(a)(3) and 535.104(c), I hereby approve the use of critical position pay for up to 400 positions supporting investment programs related to national security."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — May 29, 2026Primary

    Approving Critical Position Pay Authority for National Security Investment Workforce

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Realigning United States Core Childhood Vaccine Recommendations with Best Practices from Peer, Developed Countries

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Realigning United States Core Childhood Vaccine Recommendations with Best Practices from Peer, Developed Countries."[1] The document states: "or (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — May 29, 2026Primary

    Realigning United States Core Childhood Vaccine Recommendations with Best Practices from Peer, Developed Countries

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Removing Unnecessary and Counterproductive Restrictions on Access to Federal Lands

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Removing Unnecessary and Counterproductive Restrictions on Access to Federal Lands."[1] The document states: "My Administration has eliminated a record number of unnecessary regulations to further our Nation’s prosperity and reduce regulatory burdens on industries critical to our national and economic security while keeping sufficient environmental protections in place."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — May 29, 2026Primary

    Removing Unnecessary and Counterproductive Restrictions on Access to Federal Lands

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-95: To amend chapters 83 and 84 of title 5, United States Code, to authorize an increase of the retirement age for members of the Capitol Police.

The Receipt

S. 4530 was enacted as Public Law 119-95. Stated purpose: "To amend chapters 83 and 84 of title 5, United States Code, to authorize an increase of the retirement age for members of the Capitol Police."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — May 29, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-95 (S. 4530)

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Rutherford v. United States

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Rutherford v. United States (No. 24-820). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "When Congress declines to make a sentencing amendment retroactive—as with the change to 18 U. S. C. §924(c)—the resulting sentencing disparity cannot serve as an “extraordinary and compelling” reason that warrants a sentence reduction under §3582(c)(1)(A)(i)."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — May 28, 2026Primary

    Rutherford v. United States (No. 24-820) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Fernandez v. United States

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Fernandez v. United States (No. 24-556). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "A prisoner who collaterally attacks the validity of his conviction must proceed through 28 U. S. C. §2255, not 18 U. S. C. §3582; the supposed invalidity of a conviction is not among the “extraordinary and compelling reasons” that justify compassionate release."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — May 28, 2026Primary

    Fernandez v. United States (No. 24-556) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Pitchford v. Cain

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Pitchford v. Cain (No. 24-7351). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "In Pitchford’s direct appeal of a capital murder sentence, the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably applied the clearly established precedents of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U. S. 79, to determine that Pitchford waived his opportunity to rebut the prosecutor’s asserted race-neutral reasons for the peremptory strikes of four black prospective jurors."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — May 28, 2026Primary

    Pitchford v. Cain (No. 24-7351) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock (No. 24-935). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The Federal Arbitration Act’s exemption from compelled arbitration for workers “engaged in . . . interstate commerce,” 9 U. S. C. §1, can apply to a worker who transports goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey and who does not cross state lines or interact with vehicles that do."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — May 28, 2026Primary

    Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock (No. 24-935) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-94: Medal of Sacrifice Act of 2025

The Receipt

H.R. 3497 was enacted as Public Law 119-94. Stated purpose: "To establish a medal of service for law enforcement officers and first responders."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — May 28, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-94 (H.R. 3497)

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Texas v. New Mexico

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Texas v. New Mexico (No. 141, Orig.). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: ""[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — May 26, 2026Primary

    Texas v. New Mexico (No. 141, Orig.) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Margolin v. NAIJ

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Margolin v. NAIJ (No. 25-767). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The Fourth Circuit’s decision to vacate and remand based on an issue the parties had not raised in the District Court violated the principle of party presentation, and its judgment is reversed."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — May 26, 2026Primary

    Margolin v. NAIJ (No. 25-767) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Hamm v. Smith

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hamm v. Smith (No. 24-872). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — May 21, 2026Primary

    Hamm v. Smith (No. 24-872) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides M & K Employee Solutions, Inc. v. Trustees of IAM Nat. Pension

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in M & K Employee Solutions, Inc. v. Trustees of IAM Nat. Pension (No. 23-1209). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The provisions of ERISA governing the calculation of withdrawal liability from an underfunded Multiemployer Pension Plan— i.e., the withdrawing employer’s share of the plan’s unfunded vested benefits—do not require that actuarial assumptions underlying the calculation be selected on or before the statutory measurement date. 29 U. S. C. §§1391, 1393."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — May 21, 2026Primary

    M & K Employee Solutions, Inc. v. Trustees of IAM Nat. Pension (No. 23-1209) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. (No. 24-983). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "In action filed by the Havana Docks Corporation pursuant to Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act, 22 U. S. C. §6021 et seq., related to its property interest in the operation of docks at the Port of Havana, respondent cruise lines’ use of the docks is sufficient to establish that they used “property which was confiscated by the Cuban Government;” Havana Docks is not required to establish that the cruise lines “trafficked” in Havana Dock’s property interest."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — May 21, 2026Primary

    Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. (No. 24-983) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks."[1] The document states: "The United States is a global leader in financial innovation, driven in part by the rapid growth of financial technology (fintech) firms."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — May 19, 2026Primary

    Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System."[1] The document states: "It is the policy of my Administration to restore integrity to America’s financial system, safeguard financial institutions against structural risks, and deter fraud and abuse."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — May 19, 2026Primary

    Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

To Implement Certain Provisions in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, and for Other Purposes

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "To Implement Certain Provisions in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, and for Other Purposes."[1] The document states: "3721(g)), to provide that in the case of a beneficiary sub-Saharan African country, duty-free treatment provided under title V of the Trade Act shall remain in effect through December 31, 2026."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — May 19, 2026Primary

    To Implement Certain Provisions in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, and for Other Purposes

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-91: Sloan Canyon Conservation and Lateral Pipeline Act

The Receipt

H.R. 972 was enacted as Public Law 119-91. Stated purpose: "To amend the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area Act to adjust the boundary of the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — May 19, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-91 (H.R. 972)

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-92: Investing in All of America Act of 2025

The Receipt

H.R. 2066 was enacted as Public Law 119-92. Stated purpose: "To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to exclude from the limit on leverage certain amounts invested in smaller enterprises located in rural or low-income areas and small businesses in critical technology areas, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — May 19, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-92 (H.R. 2066)

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-93: Cape Fox Land Entitlement Finalization Act of 2025

The Receipt

H.R. 2815 was enacted as Public Law 119-93. Stated purpose: "To provide equitable treatment for the people of the Village Corporation established for the Native Village of Saxman, Alaska, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — May 19, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-93 (H.R. 2815)

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC (No. 24-1238). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "A claim that one company negligently hired another to transport goods is not preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act because States retain authority to regulate safety “with respect to motor vehicles” under the Act. 49 U. S. C. §14501(c)(2)(A)."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — May 14, 2026Primary

    Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC (No. 24-1238) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties (No. 25-83). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "A federal court that has previously stayed claims in a pending action under §3 of the Federal Arbitration Act has jurisdiction to confirm or vacate a resulting arbitral award on those claims as prescribed in §9 and §10 of the Act."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — May 14, 2026Primary

    Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties (No. 25-83) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-89: Rural Broadband Protection Act of 2025

The Receipt

S. 98 was enacted as Public Law 119-89. Stated purpose: "To require the Federal Communications Commission to establish a vetting process for prospective applicants for high-cost universal service program funding."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — May 11, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-89 (S. 98)

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-90: To require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to extend the time period during which licensees are required to commence construction of certain hydropower projects.

The Receipt

S. 1020 was enacted as Public Law 119-90. Stated purpose: "To require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to extend the time period during which licensees are required to commence construction of certain hydropower projects."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — May 11, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-90 (S. 1020)

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Federal Rule: Implementing PATRIOT Act Improvements: Contraband Cigarettes and Smokeless Tobacco

The Receipt

Justice Department published a significant final rule, "Implementing PATRIOT Act Improvements: Contraband Cigarettes and Smokeless Tobacco", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives ("ATF") is amending Department of Justice ("Department") regulations to implement certain provisions of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 ("PATRIOT Improvement Act") relating to trafficking in contraband cigarettes or smokeless tobacco. This act amended the Contraband Cigarette Trafficking Act ("CCTA") by, among oth"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Justice Department — May 8, 2026Primary

    Implementing PATRIOT Act Improvements: Contraband Cigarettes and Smokeless Tobacco

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-88: Tribal Trust Land Homeownership Act of 2025

The Receipt

S. 723 was enacted as Public Law 119-88. Stated purpose: "To require the Bureau of Indian Affairs to process and complete all mortgage packages associated with residential and business mortgages on Indian land by certain deadlines, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — May 4, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-88 (S. 723)

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Imposing Sanctions on Those Responsible for Repression in Cuba and for Threats to United States National Security and Foreign Policy

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Imposing Sanctions on Those Responsible for Repression in Cuba and for Threats to United States National Security and Foreign Policy."[1] The document states: "or (b)  The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that are issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order;"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — May 1, 2026Primary

    Imposing Sanctions on Those Responsible for Repression in Cuba and for Threats to United States National Security and Foreign Policy

    View Original Source →

APRIL 2026 — 21 Receipts

EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting."[1] The document states: "The American people expect their Government to operate with integrity, efficiency, and transparency."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — April 30, 2026Primary

    Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting

    View Original Source →
CONSTITUTIONENACTED

National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Weekend, 2026

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential proclamation, "National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Weekend, 2026."[1] The document states: "TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 2 through May 3, 2026, as National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Weekend."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATION — The White House — April 30, 2026Primary

    National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Weekend, 2026

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Promoting Retirement-Savings Access for American Workers by Establishing TrumpIRA.gov

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Promoting Retirement-Savings Access for American Workers by Establishing TrumpIRA.gov."[1] The document states: "It is the policy of the United States to promote high-quality, low-cost individual retirement accounts (IRAs) offered by private-sector financial institutions that meet objective standards of cost, transparency, and fiduciary responsibility."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — April 30, 2026Primary

    Promoting Retirement-Savings Access for American Workers by Establishing TrumpIRA.gov

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-86: Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026.

The Receipt

H.R. 7147 was enacted as Public Law 119-86. Stated purpose: "Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — April 30, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-86 (H.R. 7147)

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-87: To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.

The Receipt

S. 4465 was enacted as Public Law 119-87. Stated purpose: "To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — April 30, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-87 (S. 4465)

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport (No. 24-781). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "In a 42 U. S. C. §1983 suit challenging a subpoena issued by the New Jersey Attorney General demanding documents and donor information, First Choice has established a present injury to its First Amendment associational rights sufficient to confer Article III standing."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — April 29, 2026Primary

    First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport (No. 24-781) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Louisiana v. Callais

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Louisiana v. Callais (No. 24-109). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Because the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 52 U. S. C. §10301 et seq., did not require Louisiana to create an additional majority-minority district, no compelling interest justified the State’s use of race in creating SB8, and that map is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — April 29, 2026Primary

    Louisiana v. Callais (No. 24-109) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-85: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.

The Receipt

H.J. Res. 140 was enacted as Public Law 119-85. Stated purpose: "Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — April 27, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-85 (H.J. Res. 140)

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel (No. 24-783). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Because 28 U. S. C. §1446(b)(1)’s text, structure, and context are inconsistent with equitable tolling, Enbridge’s removal of the case to federal court outside the statute’s 30-day deadline was untimely."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — April 22, 2026Primary

    Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel (No. 24-783) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Hencely v. Fluor Corp.

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hencely v. Fluor Corp. (No. 24-924). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit erred in finding Winston Hencely’s state-law tort claims preempted where the Federal Government neither ordered nor authorized Fluor Corporation’s challenged conduct."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — April 22, 2026Primary

    Hencely v. Fluor Corp. (No. 24-924) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides District of Columbia v. R.W.

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in District of Columbia v. R.W. (No. 25-248). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Because Officer Vanterpool clearly had reasonable suspicion to stop R. W., the judgment of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — April 20, 2026Primary

    District of Columbia v. R.W. (No. 25-248) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Accelerating Medical Treatments for Serious Mental Illness

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Accelerating Medical Treatments for Serious Mental Illness."[1] The document states: "It is the policy of my Administration to accelerate innovative research models and appropriate drug approvals to increase access to psychedelic drugs that could save lives and reverse the crisis of serious mental illness in America."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — April 18, 2026Primary

    Accelerating Medical Treatments for Serious Mental Illness

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-84: To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 through April 30, 2026, and for other purposes.

The Receipt

H.R. 8322 was enacted as Public Law 119-84. Stated purpose: "To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 through April 30, 2026, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — April 18, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-84 (H.R. 8322)

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish (No. 24-813). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Chevron has plausibly alleged a close relationship between its challenged crude-oil production and the performance of its federal aviation gas refining duties and has therefore satisfied the “relating to” requirement of the federal officer removal statute, 28 U. S. C. §1442(a)(1)."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — April 17, 2026Primary

    Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish (No. 24-813) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Federal Rule: Schedule of Fees for Consular Services-Fee for Administrative Processing of Request for Certificate of Loss of Nationality of the United

The Receipt

State Department published a significant final rule, "Schedule of Fees for Consular Services-Fee for Administrative Processing of Request for Certificate of Loss of Nationality of the United States; Correction", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "The Department of State is correcting a rulemaking that appeared in the Federal Register on March 13, 2026. There was an erroneous paragraph designation in an amendatory instruction."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — State Department — April 17, 2026Primary

    Schedule of Fees for Consular Services-Fee for Administrative Processing of Request for Certificate of Loss of Nationality of the United States; Correction

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-82: Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2025

The Receipt

S. 1884 was enacted as Public Law 119-82. Stated purpose: "To clarify the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2016, to appropriately limit the application of defenses based on the passage of time and other non-merits defenses to claims under that Act."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — April 13, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-82 (S. 1884)

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-83: Small Business Innovation and Economic Security Act

The Receipt

S. 3971 was enacted as Public Law 119-83. Stated purpose: "To extend the SBIR and STTR programs, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — April 13, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-83 (S. 3971)

    View Original Source →
CONSTITUTIONENACTED

Day of Celebration in Honor of the Life of Henry Clay, 2026

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential proclamation, "Day of Celebration in Honor of the Life of Henry Clay, 2026."[1] The document states: "TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 12, 2026, as a day of celebration in honor of the life of Henry Clay."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATION — The White House — April 11, 2026Primary

    Day of Celebration in Honor of the Life of Henry Clay, 2026

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Liberating the Department of Homeland Security From the Democrat-Caused Shutdown

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Liberating the Department of Homeland Security From the Democrat-Caused Shutdown."[1] The document states: "Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof;"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — April 3, 2026Primary

    Liberating the Department of Homeland Security From the Democrat-Caused Shutdown

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Adjusting Imports of Pharmaceuticals and Pharmaceutical Ingredients into the United States

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Adjusting Imports of Pharmaceuticals and Pharmaceutical Ingredients into the United States."[1] The document states: "The Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) recently transmitted to me a report on his investigation into the effects of imports of pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients on the national security of the United States under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended, 19 U.S.C."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — April 2, 2026Primary

    Adjusting Imports of Pharmaceuticals and Pharmaceutical Ingredients into the United States

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Strengthening Actions Taken to Adjust Imports of Aluminum, Steel, and Copper Into the United States

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Strengthening Actions Taken to Adjust Imports of Aluminum, Steel, and Copper Into the United States."[1] The document states: "In those actions, I also directed the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to establish a process for including additional metal products within the scope of the additional ad valorem duties imposed in Proclamation 9704, as amended;"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — April 2, 2026Primary

    Strengthening Actions Taken to Adjust Imports of Aluminum, Steel, and Copper Into the United States

    View Original Source →

MARCH 2026 — 21 Receipts

ELECTIONSENACTED

Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections."[1] The document states: "4, it is hereby ordered: The right to vote in Federal elections is reserved exclusively for citizens of the United States under the Constitution and Federal law."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — March 31, 2026Primary

    Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Chiles v. Salazar

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Chiles v. Salazar (No. 24-539). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Colorado’s law banning conversion therapy, as applied to petitioner’s talk therapy, regulates speech based on viewpoint, and the lower courts erred by failing to apply sufficiently rigorous First Amendment scrutiny."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — March 31, 2026Primary

    Chiles v. Salazar (No. 24-539) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors."[1] The document states: "Despite this progress, some entities continue to engage in DEI activities and often attempt to conceal their efforts to do so."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — March 26, 2026Primary

    Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Rico v. United States

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Rico v. United States (No. 24-1056). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 does not authorize a rule automatically extending a defendant’s term of supervised release when the defendant fails to report to a probation officer."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — March 25, 2026Primary

    Rico v. United States (No. 24-1056) — slip opinions list, October Term 2025

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment (No. 24-171). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Internet service provider Cox Communications neither induced its users’ infringement of copyrighted works nor provided a service tailored to infringement, and accordingly Cox is not contributorily liable for the infringement of Sony’s copyrights."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — March 25, 2026Primary

    Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment (No. 24-171) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Further Continuance of the Federal Emergency Management Agency Review Council

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Further Continuance of the Federal Emergency Management Agency Review Council."[1] The document states: "Sections 1 and 2 of Executive Order 14378 are hereby superseded by sections 1 and 2 of this order."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — March 24, 2026Primary

    Further Continuance of the Federal Emergency Management Agency Review Council

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Zorn v. Linton

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Zorn v. Linton (No. 25-297). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Because the Second Circuit failed to identify a case where an officer using a routine wristlock on a protester after issuing a verbal warning, without more, was held to have violated the Constitution, Sergeant Jacob Zorn was entitled to qualified immunity; the Second Circuit’s contrary conclusion was erroneous."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — March 23, 2026Primary

    Zorn v. Linton (No. 25-297) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Olivier v. City of Brandon

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Olivier v. City of Brandon (No. 24-993). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Petitioner Gabriel Olivier’s suit seeking purely prospective relief—an injunction stopping officials from enforcing an ordinance in the future—can proceed, notwithstanding his prior conviction for violating that ordinance; Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U. S. 477 (1994), does not hold otherwise."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — March 20, 2026Primary

    Olivier v. City of Brandon (No. 24-993) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Establishing the Task Force to Eliminate Fraud

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Establishing the Task Force to Eliminate Fraud."[1] The document states: "American taxpayers fund a vast benefits system for citizens in need that includes housing, food, medical care, cash assistance, and more."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — March 16, 2026Primary

    Establishing the Task Force to Eliminate Fraud

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Promoting Access to Mortgage Credit

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Promoting Access to Mortgage Credit."[1] The document states: "It is the policy of the United States to improve the availability and affordability of mortgage credit;"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — March 13, 2026Primary

    Promoting Access to Mortgage Credit

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Removing Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Home Construction

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Removing Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Home Construction."[1] The document states: "It is the policy of my Administration to reduce regulatory barriers to building homes and to steward taxpayer dollars in a manner that promotes housing affordability."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — March 13, 2026Primary

    Removing Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Home Construction

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Adjusting Certain Delegations Under the Defense Production Act

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Adjusting Certain Delegations Under the Defense Production Act."[1] The document states: "or (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — March 13, 2026Primary

    Adjusting Certain Delegations Under the Defense Production Act

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Ensuring Truthful Advertising of Products Claiming to be Made in America

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Ensuring Truthful Advertising of Products Claiming to be Made in America."[1] The document states: "In determining whether such claims constitute a violation of law, including an unfair or deceptive act or practice, the FTC shall, as needed, consult with other executive departments and agencies (agencies) with subject-matter expertise with respect to the relevant products."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — March 13, 2026Primary

    Ensuring Truthful Advertising of Products Claiming to be Made in America

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Federal Rule: Schedule of Fees for Consular Services-Fee for Administrative Processing of Request for Certificate of Loss of Nationality of the United

The Receipt

State Department published a significant final rule, "Schedule of Fees for Consular Services-Fee for Administrative Processing of Request for Certificate of Loss of Nationality of the United States", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "This final rule adjusts the Schedule of Fees for Consular Services by reducing the fee for Administrative Processing of Request for Certificate of Loss of Nationality of the United States from $2,350 to $450."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — State Department — March 13, 2026Primary

    Schedule of Fees for Consular Services-Fee for Administrative Processing of Request for Certificate of Loss of Nationality of the United States

    View Original Source →
IMMIGRATIONENACTED

Federal Rule: Visas: Enhancing Vetting and Combatting Fraud in the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program

The Receipt

State Department published a significant final rule, "Visas: Enhancing Vetting and Combatting Fraud in the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "The Department of State ("Department") is amending regulations governing the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program ("DV Program") to improve the integrity of, and combat fraud in, the program. These amendments require a petitioner to the DV Program to provide valid, unexpired passport information and to upload a scan of the biographic and signature page in the electronic entry form or to otherwise indi"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — State Department — March 11, 2026Primary

    Visas: Enhancing Vetting and Combatting Fraud in the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Commitment to Countering Cartel Criminal Activity

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential proclamation, "Commitment to Countering Cartel Criminal Activity."[1] The document states: "The United States, under my leadership, has demonstrated a sustained commitment towards achieving the dismantlement of cartels and foreign terrorists operating in the Western Hemisphere."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATION — The White House — March 7, 2026Primary

    Commitment to Countering Cartel Criminal Activity

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Combating Cybercrime, Fraud, and Predatory Schemes Against American Citizens

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Combating Cybercrime, Fraud, and Predatory Schemes Against American Citizens."[1] The document states: "It is the policy of the United States to protect Americans from, and harden our financial and digital systems against, these threats."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — March 6, 2026Primary

    Combating Cybercrime, Fraud, and Predatory Schemes Against American Citizens

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Urias-Orellana v. Bondi

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Urias-Orellana v. Bondi (No. 24-777). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The Immigration and Nationality Act requires application of the substantial-evidence standard to the Board of Immigration Appeals’ agency’s determination whether a given set of undisputed facts rises to the level of persecution under 8 U. S. C. §1101(a)(42)(A)."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — March 4, 2026Primary

    Urias-Orellana v. Bondi (No. 24-777) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp. (No. 24-1021). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The New Jersey Transit Corporation is not an arm of the State of New Jersey and thus is not entitled to share in New Jersey’s interstate sovereign immunity."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — March 4, 2026Primary

    Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp. (No. 24-1021) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSDEVELOPING

Supreme Court Acts on Emergency Application in Mirabelli v. Bonta

The Receipt

The Supreme Court ruled on an emergency application in Mirabelli v. Bonta (No. 25A810). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The application filed by parents and teachers to vacate the Ninth Circuit’s stay of the District Court’s injunction pending appeal is granted as to the parents under the four-factor test in Alabama Assn. of Realtors v. Department of Health and Human Servs., 594 U. S. 758, 763 (2021) (per curiam)."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — March 2, 2026Primary

    Mirabelli v. Bonta (No. 25A810) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
IMMIGRATIONENACTED

Federal Rule: Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer Electronic Filing

The Receipt

Justice Department published a significant final rule, "Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer Electronic Filing", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "The Executive Office for Immigration Review ("EOIR") is implementing electronic filing and records applications for all cases before the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer ("OCAHO"). This interim final rule ("IFR") updates the relevant regulations necessary to implement these electronic filing and records applications, including by requiring certain users to file documents electron"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Justice Department — March 2, 2026Primary

    Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer Electronic Filing

    View Original Source →

FEBRUARY 2026 — 24 Receipts

IMMIGRATIONENACTED

Federal Rule: Appellate Procedures for the Board of Immigration Appeals; Extension of Comment Period

The Receipt

Justice Department published a significant final rule, "Appellate Procedures for the Board of Immigration Appeals; Extension of Comment Period", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "On February 6, 2026, the Executive Office for Immigration Review ("EOIR") published in the Federal Register the interim final rule ("IFR") "Appellate Procedures for the Board of Immigration Appeals" with comments originally due March 9, 2026. This document extends the deadline for written comments to April 8, 2026."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Justice Department — February 27, 2026Primary

    Appellate Procedures for the Board of Immigration Appeals; Extension of Comment Period

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Villarreal v. Texas

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Villarreal v. Texas (No. 24-557). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "A trial court’s qualified conferral order that prohibits only discussion of the defendant’s testimony for its own sake during a midtestimony overnight recess permissibly balances the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel against the burden of offering unaltered trial testimony and does not violate the Constitution."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — February 25, 2026Primary

    Villarreal v. Texas (No. 24-557) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Geo Group, Inc. v. Menocal

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Geo Group, Inc. v. Menocal (No. 24-758). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Because the Court’s decision in Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Constr. Co., 309 U. S. 18 (1940), provides federal contractors a potential merits defense rather than an immunity from suit, a pretrial order denying Yearsley protection is not immediately appealable."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — February 25, 2026Primary

    Geo Group, Inc. v. Menocal (No. 24-758) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist (No. 24-724). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Because the District Court’s erroneous dismissal of Whole Foods Market did not cure the jurisdictional defect that existed when this case was removed to federal court, the Fifth Circuit correctly vacated the judgment in favor of Hain Celestial Group."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — February 24, 2026Primary

    Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist (No. 24-724) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Postal Service v. Konan

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Postal Service v. Konan (No. 24-351). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The United States retains sovereign immunity for claims arising out of the intentional nondelivery of mail because both “miscarriage” and “loss” of mail under the Federal Tort Claims Act’s postal exception, 28 U. S. C. §2680(b), can occur as a result of the Postal Service’s intentional failure to deliver the mail."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — February 24, 2026Primary

    Postal Service v. Konan (No. 24-351) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Continuing the Suspension of Duty-Free De Minimis Treatment for All Countries

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Continuing the Suspension of Duty-Free De Minimis Treatment for All Countries."[1] The document states: "In section 6 of Executive Order 14324, I made clear that the suspension of, or continued suspension of, duty-free de minimis treatment, as detailed in Executive Order 14324, shall not be affected if the additional duties imposed under Executive Order 14193, as amended;"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — February 21, 2026Primary

    Continuing the Suspension of Duty-Free De Minimis Treatment for All Countries

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Ending Certain Tariff Actions

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Ending Certain Tariff Actions."[1] The document states: "and Executive Order 14382 shall no longer be in effect and, as soon as practicable, shall no longer be collected."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — February 21, 2026Primary

    Ending Certain Tariff Actions

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (No. 24-1287). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "The International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 91 Stat. 1626, does not authorize the President to impose tariffs."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — February 20, 2026Primary

    Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (No. 24-1287) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Federal Rule: Hiring Authority for College Graduates

The Receipt

Personnel Management Office published a significant final rule, "Hiring Authority for College Graduates", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a final rule to amend its career and career-conditional employment regulations. The revision is necessary to implement the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2019. This statute requires OPM to issue regulations establishing a hiring authority for college graduates into positions at specified grades in th"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Personnel Management Office — February 20, 2026Primary

    Hiring Authority for College Graduates

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Federal Rule: Hiring Authority for Post-Secondary Students

The Receipt

Personnel Management Office published a significant final rule, "Hiring Authority for Post-Secondary Students", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a final rule to amend its career and career-conditional employment regulations. The revision is necessary to implement section 1108 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2019, which requires OPM to issue regulations implementing hiring authorities that allow agencies to hire certain post-secondary st"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Personnel Management Office — February 19, 2026Primary

    Hiring Authority for Post-Secondary Students

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Promoting the National Defense by Ensuring an Adequate Supply of Elemental Phosphorus and Glyphosate-Based Herbicides

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Promoting the National Defense by Ensuring an Adequate Supply of Elemental Phosphorus and Glyphosate-Based Herbicides."[1] The document states: "Accordingly, I hereby find, pursuant to section 101 of the Act, that domestic elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides meet the criteria specified in section 101(b) of the Act (50 U.S.C."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — February 18, 2026Primary

    Promoting the National Defense by Ensuring an Adequate Supply of Elemental Phosphorus and Glyphosate-Based Herbicides

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-78: Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the D.C. Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025.

The Receipt

H.J. Res. 142 was enacted as Public Law 119-78. Stated purpose: "Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the D.C. Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — February 18, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-78 (H.J. Res. 142)

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Strengthening United States National Defense with America’s Beautiful Clean Coal Power Generation Fleet

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Strengthening United States National Defense with America’s Beautiful Clean Coal Power Generation Fleet."[1] The document states: "or (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — February 11, 2026Primary

    Strengthening United States National Defense with America’s Beautiful Clean Coal Power Generation Fleet

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-77: Ending Improper Payments to Deceased People Act

The Receipt

S. 269 was enacted as Public Law 119-77. Stated purpose: "To improve coordination between Federal and State agencies and the Do Not Pay working system."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — February 10, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-77 (S. 269)

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Modifying Duties to Address Threats to the United States by the Government of the Russian Federation

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Modifying Duties to Address Threats to the United States by the Government of the Russian Federation."[1] The document states: "Note 2 to subchapter III of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States are hereby terminated."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — February 6, 2026Primary

    Modifying Duties to Address Threats to the United States by the Government of the Russian Federation

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Addressing Threats to the United States by the Government of Iran

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Addressing Threats to the United States by the Government of Iran."[1] The document states: "and others — have further described the threat posed by the Government of Iran and taken additional action to deal with the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12957."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — February 6, 2026Primary

    Addressing Threats to the United States by the Government of Iran

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Ensuring Affordable Beef for the American Consumer

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Ensuring Affordable Beef for the American Consumer."[1] The document states: "Apart from the direct threat of burns and burn-associated deaths to cattle, cattle ranchers have had to adapt to indirect effects of wildfires, including changes in grazing patterns, loss of feed supplies, and suboptimal animal health for those cattle surviving the wildfires."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — February 6, 2026Primary

    Ensuring Affordable Beef for the American Consumer

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Establishing an America First Arms Transfer Strategy

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Establishing an America First Arms Transfer Strategy."[1] The document states: "American-manufactured military equipment is the best in the world, resulting in American dominance across international defense exports."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — February 6, 2026Primary

    Establishing an America First Arms Transfer Strategy

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Establishing an America First Arms Transfer Strategy

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Establishing an America First Arms Transfer Strategy."[1] The document states: "American-manufactured military equipment is the best in the world, resulting in American dominance across international defense exports."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — February 6, 2026Primary

    Establishing an America First Arms Transfer Strategy

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Protecting the National Security and Welfare of the United States and its Citizens from Criminal Actors and Other Public Safety Threats

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Protecting the National Security and Welfare of the United States and its Citizens from Criminal Actors and Other Public Safety Threats."[1] The document states: "It is the policy of the United States to protect its welfare and security, and the welfare and security of its citizens, from criminal actors."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — February 6, 2026Primary

    Protecting the National Security and Welfare of the United States and its Citizens from Criminal Actors and Other Public Safety Threats

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-76: Bankruptcy Administration Improvement Act of 2025

The Receipt

S. 3424 was enacted as Public Law 119-76. Stated purpose: "To amend titles 11 and 28, United States Code, to modify the compensation payable to trustees serving in cases under chapter 7 of title 11, United States Code, to extend the term of certain temporary offices of bankruptcy judges, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — February 6, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-76 (S. 3424)

    View Original Source →
IMMIGRATIONENACTED

Federal Rule: Appellate Procedures for the Board of Immigration Appeals

The Receipt

Justice Department published a significant final rule, "Appellate Procedures for the Board of Immigration Appeals", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "This interim final rule ("IFR") amends Department of Justice ("Department" or "DOJ") regulations to streamline administrative appellate review by the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board" or "BIA") of decisions by Immigration Judges by making review of such decisions on the merits discretionary, by setting appropriate times for briefing in cases that are reviewed on the merits, and by streamlining"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Justice Department — February 6, 2026Primary

    Appellate Procedures for the Board of Immigration Appeals

    View Original Source →
IMMIGRATIONENACTED

Federal Rule: Improving Performance, Accountability and Responsiveness in the Civil Service

The Receipt

Personnel Management Office published a significant final rule, "Improving Performance, Accountability and Responsiveness in the Civil Service", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a rule to increase career employee accountability. Agency supervisors report great difficulty removing employees for poor performance or misconduct. The final rule authorizes agencies to move policy-influencing positions into Schedule Policy/Career. These positions will remain career jobs filled on a nonpartisan basis. Yet they will be at-will po"[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Personnel Management Office — February 6, 2026Primary

    Improving Performance, Accountability and Responsiveness in the Civil Service

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-75: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026

The Receipt

H.R. 7148 was enacted as Public Law 119-75. Stated purpose: "Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — February 3, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-75 (H.R. 7148)

    View Original Source →

JANUARY 2026 — 25 Receipts

EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Addressing Threats to the United States by the Government of Cuba

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Addressing Threats to the United States by the Government of Cuba."[1] The document states: "For example, Cuba blatantly hosts dangerous adversaries of the United States, inviting them to base sophisticated military and intelligence capabilities in Cuba that directly threaten the national security of the United States."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — January 29, 2026Primary

    Addressing Threats to the United States by the Government of Cuba

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Addressing State and Local Failures to Rebuild Los Angeles After Wildfire Disasters

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Addressing State and Local Failures to Rebuild Los Angeles After Wildfire Disasters."[1] The document states: "The Federal Government has approved numerous individual relief claims to provide financial support directly to owners of homes and businesses and help survivors repair, rebuild, return home, reopen their businesses, and restore their communities."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — January 27, 2026Primary

    Addressing State and Local Failures to Rebuild Los Angeles After Wildfire Disasters

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Klein v. Martin

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Klein v. Martin (No. 25-51). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Because the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the award of a new trial based on reasoning that departed from the strict standards that govern the grant of federal habeas relief to prisoners convicted in state court prescribed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, the Court grants the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari and reverses the judgment below."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — January 26, 2026Primary

    Klein v. Martin (No. 25-51) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Continuance of the Federal Emergency Management Agency Review Council

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Continuance of the Federal Emergency Management Agency Review Council."[1] The document states: "or (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — January 24, 2026Primary

    Continuance of the Federal Emergency Management Agency Review Council

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-73: Trafficking Survivors Relief Act

The Receipt

H.R. 4323 was enacted as Public Law 119-73. Stated purpose: "To provide for the vacating of certain convictions and expungement of certain arrests of victims of human trafficking."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — January 23, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-73 (H.R. 4323)

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-74: Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026

The Receipt

H.R. 6938 was enacted as Public Law 119-74. Stated purpose: "Making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — January 23, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-74 (H.R. 6938)

    View Original Source →
IMMIGRATIONENACTED

Federal Rule: Enhanced Air Cargo Advance Screening (ACAS); Corrections

The Receipt

Homeland Security Department published a significant final rule, "Enhanced Air Cargo Advance Screening (ACAS); Corrections", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is restoring the specific authority citations originally found in parts 103 and 122 of title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations which were erroneously removed following the publication of the Enhanced Air Cargo Advance Screening (ACAS) interim final rule on November 21, 2025."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Homeland Security Department — January 22, 2026Primary

    Enhanced Air Cargo Advance Screening (ACAS); Corrections

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Berk v. Choy

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Berk v. Choy (No. 24-440). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Delaware law requiring a plaintiff suing for medical malpractice to provide an affidavit from a medical professional attesting to the suit’s merit, Del. Code, Tit. 18, §6853(a)(1), conflicts with a valid Federal Rule of Civil Procedure and does not apply in federal court."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — January 20, 2026Primary

    Berk v. Choy (No. 24-440) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Ellingburg v. United States

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Ellingburg v. United States (No. 24-482). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Restitution under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 is criminal punishment for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — January 20, 2026Primary

    Ellingburg v. United States (No. 24-482) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton (No. 24-808). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(1)’s reasonable-time limit applies to a motion alleging that a judgment is void under Rule 60(b)(4)."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — January 20, 2026Primary

    Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton (No. 24-808) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-70: Disabled Veterans Housing Support Act

The Receipt

H.R. 224 was enacted as Public Law 119-70. Stated purpose: "To amend section 102(a)(20) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to require the exclusion of service-connected disability compensation when determining whether a person is a person of low and moderate income, a person of low income, or a person of moderate income, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — January 20, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-70 (H.R. 224)

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-71: VA Budget Shortfall Accountability Act

The Receipt

H.R. 1823 was enacted as Public Law 119-71. Stated purpose: "To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Comptroller General of the United States to report on certain funding shortfalls in the Department of Veterans Affairs."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — January 20, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-71 (H.R. 1823)

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-72: Focused Assistance and Skills Training for Veterans' Employment and Transition Success Act

The Receipt

H.R. 4446 was enacted as Public Law 119-72. Stated purpose: "To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the conditions under which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs is required to redevelop the individualized vocational rehabilitation plan for a veteran, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — January 20, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-72 (H.R. 4446)

    View Original Source →
CONSTITUTIONENACTED

Martin Luther King, Jr., Federal Holiday, 2026

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential proclamation, "Martin Luther King, Jr., Federal Holiday, 2026."[1] The document states: "TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim January 19, 2026, as the Martin Luther King, Jr., Federal Holiday."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATION — The White House — January 19, 2026Primary

    Martin Luther King, Jr., Federal Holiday, 2026

    View Original Source →
IMMIGRATIONENACTED

Federal Rule: Improving Continuity for Religious Organizations and Their Employees

The Receipt

Homeland Security Department published a significant final rule, "Improving Continuity for Religious Organizations and Their Employees", in the Federal Register.[1] Agency abstract: "This interim final rule (IFR) amends U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regulations to remove the requirement that R-1 religious workers who have reached the maximum period of stay must reside abroad and be physically present outside the United States for one year before being eligible for readmission in R-1 status after departing from the United States upon reaching the maximum admission "[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    FEDERAL REGISTER — Homeland Security Department — January 16, 2026Primary

    Improving Continuity for Religious Organizations and Their Employees

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Adjusting Imports Of Semiconductors, Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment, And Their Derivative Products Into The United States

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Adjusting Imports Of Semiconductors, Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment, And Their Derivative Products Into The United States."[1] The document states: "Based on the facts considered in that investigation, and taking into account the close relation of the economic welfare of the Nation to our national security and other relevant factors, see 19 U.S.C."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — January 14, 2026Primary

    Adjusting Imports Of Semiconductors, Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment, And Their Derivative Products Into The United States

    View Original Source →
ECONOMYENACTED

Adjusting Imports of Processed Critical Minerals and Their Derivative Products into the United States

The Receipt

Trump issued a presidential action, "Adjusting Imports of Processed Critical Minerals and Their Derivative Products into the United States."[1] The document states: "On October 24, 2025, the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) transmitted to me a report on his investigation into the effects of imports of processed critical minerals and their derivative products (PCMDPs) on the national security of the United States under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended, 19 U.S.C."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENT — The White House — January 14, 2026Primary

    Adjusting Imports of Processed Critical Minerals and Their Derivative Products into the United States

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Barrett v. United States

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Barrett v. United States (No. 24-5774). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Congress did not clearly authorize convictions under both 18 U. S. C. §§924(c)(1)(A)(i) and (j) for a single act that violates both provisions—therefore, one act that violates both may spawn only one conviction; the part of the Second Circuit’s judgment that held otherwise is reversed."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — January 14, 2026Primary

    Barrett v. United States (No. 24-5774) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Case v. Montana

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Case v. Montana (No. 24-624). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Under the standard set in Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U. S. 398, 400, the Fourth Amendment allows police officers to enter a home without a warrant if they have an “objectively reasonable basis for believing” that someone inside needs emergency assistance; that standard was met here."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — January 14, 2026Primary

    Case v. Montana (No. 24-624) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Bost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections (No. 24-568). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "As a candidate for office, Congressman Bost has standing to challenge the rules that govern the counting of votes in his election."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — January 14, 2026Primary

    Bost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections (No. 24-568) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
CONGRESSENACTED

Public Law 119-69: Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act of 2025

The Receipt

S. 222 was enacted as Public Law 119-69. Stated purpose: "To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to allow schools that participate in the school lunch program to serve whole milk, and for other purposes."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION — U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov) — January 14, 2026Primary

    Public Law 119-69 (S. 222)

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Safeguarding Venezuelan Oil Revenue for the Good of the American and Venezuelan People

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Safeguarding Venezuelan Oil Revenue for the Good of the American and Venezuelan People."[1] The document states: "This order and actions taken pursuant to this order shall supersede any previously issued Executive Order, and any action taken pursuant to such an order, to the extent such order or action blocks, regulates, or otherwise affects the Foreign Government Deposit Funds."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — January 10, 2026Primary

    Safeguarding Venezuelan Oil Revenue for the Good of the American and Venezuelan People

    View Original Source →
COURTSFINAL

Supreme Court Decides Bowe v. United States

The Receipt

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bowe v. United States (No. 24-5438). The Court's holding, as summarized by the Reporter of Decisions: "Title 28 U. S. C. §2244(b)(3)(E) does not bar this Court’s review of a federal prisoner’s request to file a second or successive §2255 motion for postconviction relief, and §2244(b)(1) does not apply to second or successive motions filed under §2255(h) by federal prisoners challenging their convictions or sentences."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    COURT OPINION / ORDER — Supreme Court of the United States — January 9, 2026Primary

    Bowe v. United States (No. 24-5438) — slip opinion

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Prioritizing the Warfighter in Defense Contracting

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Prioritizing the Warfighter in Defense Contracting."[1] The document states: "It is the policy of the United States Government to accelerate defense procurement and revitalize the defense industrial base to maintain peace through strength."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — January 7, 2026Primary

    Prioritizing the Warfighter in Defense Contracting

    View Original Source →
EXECUTIVE POWERENACTED

Regarding the Acquisition of Certain Assets of Emcore Corporation by Hiefo Corporation

The Receipt

Trump issued an executive order, "Regarding the Acquisition of Certain Assets of Emcore Corporation by Hiefo Corporation."[1] The document states: "For the purposes of sections 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c) of this order, the United States nationals on HieFo’s Board of Directors as of November 26, 2025, are not considered Affiliates of HieFo."[1]

Sources

  1. [1]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER — The White House — January 2, 2026Primary

    Regarding the Acquisition of Certain Assets of Emcore Corporation by Hiefo Corporation

    View Original Source →